The new layout boards are complete!

Originally Posted on the Old HVL blog March 24, 2013

OK, so a little about the design and build of the layout boards.
In general all wood is fine quality pine dressed all round (DAR). The board top is 12 mm ply (1/2 inch), while the sky board is 6mm (1/4″) ply. THe legs are “L” girders using 1×2 and 1×3 DAR pine glued and screwed on the along their length. At the base of the leg is a glue bock of 2×1 DAR pine which is used to locate a T nut, with a 5/16″ bolt as a leveller. The nut for the 5/16th bolt mounts on the top of the glue block locking the bolt in place once you’ve levelled the board. I’ll be building a better foot arrangement at some point in the future that is easier on the floor, most likely a wooden ball with a 5/16″ nut through the centre of the wooden ball.

All of the side and end rails are 3 x 1 DAR pine and these have not been glued, but have been Kreg pocket screwed together. The ply was then glued and screwed to the box. Nice, tight and very rigid. There is one rail across the board in the centre  of 2×1″ DAR pine, this has also been Kreg pocket screwed to the sides and the top was glued and screwed tothis also. The skyboard is glued and screwed to 1×2 pine DAR which acts as a stiffener and mounting point on the back of the main board. Mounting to the rear of the main boards is achieved using Kreg pocket screws.

The legs are mounted to the main board using 3 screws on each side to the sides. The top horizontal board bears the weight of the main board above; while the bottom horizontal board acts as a bearing face between boards and allows the boards to lock together using a wooden clamps from offcut of the hozontal boards and 1 x 2 DAR pine. Think an inverted U locking the two legs together. Nice, tight, simple and about 3 months in the planning.

Overall what are my impressions? Very happy to be over the hump of the work. The boards are light and strong. I can lift them fork lift style on my own without hurting myself and as I have a 50 year old back; this is a good thing. Thanks to my wife (Janette) for suggesting the mounting height for the sky boards. At 400mm above the plane of the board they are high enough to be at or just below my eye height, and with the 2×1 stiffeners behind allow easy mounting of lights that will hang out over the board for better simulation of daylight.

I’ve a few sketches and such to put on the gallery site later in the week. This should give you an idea of how the parts look. More photos will be coming before I paint everything later this month or during April, depending on the weather. Well a great day in all, now some remedial work on the old boards to bring them up to spec and height, and then my work is done.

A Texas Inglenook prototype – The ADM Mill facility New Braunfels

Occasionally for the small layout builder, a prototype comes along that you simply cannot forget. The ADM Mill located in New Braunfels, TX is a perfect example. A simple Inglenook switching location that could be built as a standalone, or incorporated into an existing layout as a peninsula. The site when I took the photos in 2004-5 was used mainly as a hard wheat facility. In the past, though it had been used for milling multiple grains as well as corn.

This photo shows the whole of the north side of the facility. Of note is the circular storage silo in the foreground which has 7 separate silos within it to allow storage of different types and kinds of grains depending on the season. The other photos in the set show different sides of the facility buildings mainly from the grade crossing on E Mill St, or further up the road in the case of the Southernmost photos.

Essentially the site lies East-West; the road crossing runs North-South. The main Mill lies on the Northside of the tracks and is the oldest part of the building; the newer storage silos on the south side look to be built during the 1970s. The main office building is on the East side of the mill, across San Antonio Street, on the East end of the Mill. Once you see the overview you’ll get a better lie of the land.

All in all, this is a nice simple Inglenook and can provide the operator with plenty of work in a small space, with nothing more than a TrackMobile for motive power. The staging can be cassette, plugin or hidden depending on whether you are using this stand-alone. If you love covered hoppers though, this layout will appeal.

ADDITIONAL

You can view the entire album of images at the following link: –>Click Here<–

40 foot Hi-Cube article has been quoted in Model Railroad Hobbyist Magazine

Originally published on the old HVL blog November 07, 2012

An article I wrote on the Shorty Hi-Cubes has been quoted by Joe Fugate in the most recent Model Railroad Hobbyist Magazine, available for free here.

I love these cars, as they are modern era cars, but short enough to fit onto all model railroads. They’re available in O scale too.

There will be a much longer article available shortly that will be posted here with more information on kit-bashing the cars, and industry options for you to use on your layout. They are not the most common of cars but they really stand out and while they are not in use now, they were in use during the period from the mid 1960s through to the early 2000s.

Have a great day.
Andrew

A Short History of the SP/SSW 40 foot Hi-cube boxcars and notes on modelling them

Introduction

[Last updated April 10 2025]

The forty-foot, 70-ton, Hi-Cube boxcars were built in the mid-1960s specifically for high volume, low weight cargo and were most often used in captive service between appliance manufacturers and distributors. They occasionally branched out into furniture and paper loads. Manufactured by Pacific Car and Foundry and Pullman-Standard, ultimately, their small size and the load limitations this imposed saw them leave the rails in a relatively short time. Other larger boxcars from around the same era continued to ride the rails when this article was written (Editor’s note: August 10, 2010).

The forty-footers were a stop-gap car, never meant to have a long life. They provided shippers and receivers with a means to utilise their existing dock and door spacing for 40-foot cars while allowing double-layer (vertical) loading of refrigerators and freezers. From an economic perspective, this was a win-win. With less money spent on new boxcars and upgrades of current boxcars than would have been required on new facilities, doubling the number of refrigerator and freezer units shipped per car made economic sense.

US appliance companies such as Amana, Maytag, Whirlpool and others would, within a decade, begin upgrading their manufacturing facilities and receiving warehouses as older ones were closed or rebuilt. As a result of these upgrades, 60ft High-Cubes, which could haul a vastly larger load, became the norm. However, there is photographic evidence of the cars riding the rails until at least the beginning of August 1984. I have seen photos showing one of the cars in revenue use in the early 2000s. Some served in paper service and maintenance-of-way (MoW) before retirement and eventual scrapping. Sadly, none to my knowledge exist in railroad museum collections.

Southern Pacific and Cotton Belt B-70-36 Box Cars

My primary interest is in Southern Pacific (SP) and Cotton Belt (SSW) hi-cube box cars, which were all built to the same design by Pacific Car & Foundry in 1966 and 1967, featuring a 5001 cubic foot capacity, Hydra-Cushion underframes and 10′-6″ Youngstown sliding doors. These cars came to be nicknamed the “Ugly Ducklings” due to their awkward appearance.

Intended for captive appliance service, their internal dimensions were 40′-6″ long, 9’ 6” wide and 13’ high. This allowed double stacking of freezers, allowing greater loads than regular boxcars. Until their introduction, the second layer of freezers was laid on their sides. This led to problems with damage to the second layer from train handling.

Externally, the cars had an overall coupled length of 45’ 5”, a maximum width of 10’ 8” and stood at their highest 16’ 10” above the rail height. It should be noted that the 1969 ORER shows the 11 SP cars one inch higher at 16’ 11”. A roster of the class B-70-36 Hi-Cube box cars for the Southern Pacific (SP) and the St Louis Southwestern (SSW) or Cotton Belt is provided in Table 1 below:

Road    Number Range    Number    Load Specific Data [1]
——————————————————————-
SP         659100-659111        12        DF-B loaders
SSW    36014–36026             13        DF, DF-B, Car Pac loaders
SSW    36027–36081             54         As Above
SSW    36082–36120             39         As Above
SSW    36121-36126                6         As Above

Total Cars:                           124

Table 1: Southern Pacific Railway System 40’ High-Cube data

NOTE: The Cotton Belt had another set of Hi-Cube cars (SSW 36000-36013) not covered by this article. These were rebuilt from cars in the SSW 33850-33949 series built by Pullman-Standard in 1951. Their roofs were raised and they were given new 10′-6″ wide by 11′-9″ tall doors. These cars were converted at Pine Bluff between December 1965 and January 1966 [2].

Operationally, the Cotton Belt (SSW) had the lion’s share of these 40-foot cars. It would appear that they were delivered in four different lots during 1966 and into 1967 that, while consecutively numbered, were given different listings in the ORERs of the time.

Modelling the 40-foot Hi-Cube

NOTE: It should be noted that these cars were few in number and in captive service between the major white-goods manufacturers and the regional distribution locations.

Built from the mid to late 1960’s they appear to have all been off the roster, or in MOW service (thus out of white-goods revenue service) by the late-1980s. recent research has shown that some went into furnitures and paper service.

Having said all of that, if you love these cars as much as I do, for a small layout or just want to have a few on your layout, the details below will be of assistance to you.

Athearn

  • The cars manufactured by Pacific Car and Foundry for Southern Pacific (SP) and the Cotton Belt (SSW) match the Athearn exterior-post model. (#1950 40′ Ob Hi-Cube Box Car – PC&F for SP 659100-659111; SSW series 36014-36126, both class B-70-36) fairly closely
  • The UP’s home-built car, which was not covered in this article, closely matches the Athearn plug-door model; these also match the rebuilt cars of the SP. (#1960 40′ Plug Door Hi-Cube Box Car – UP class B-50-4 appliance car)

Bibliography

  1. This data was sourced from the January 1969 Official Railway Equipment Register.
  2. Source: for more information please visit:
    1. For SP and SSW cars, see: http://www.railgoat.railfan.net/spcars/byclass/box/b070-36.htm
  3. See https://tycotrain.tripod.com/id28.html (updated link to the same information, just on a different site)